Page 462 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期
P. 462

宁小勇 等: 融合   TextCNN  和对抗训练的以太坊庞氏骗局检测模型                                          1425


                  [2]   Wood G. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 2014, 151: 1–32.
                  [3]   Taherdoost H. Smart contracts in blockchain technology: A critical review. Information, 2023, 14(2): 117. [doi: 10.3390/info14020117]
                  [4]   Chainalysis. The Chainalysis 2021 crypto crime report. 2020. https://go.chainalysis.com/2020-Crypto-Crime-Report.html
                  [5]   TRM. 2025 crypto crime report. 2025. https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/2025-crypto-crime-report
                  [6]   Vasek M, Moore T. Analyzing the bitcoin Ponzi scheme ecosystem. In: Proc. of the 22nd Int’l Conf. on Financial Cryptography and Data
                     Security. Nieuwpoort: Springer, 2019. 101–112. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58820-8_8]
                  [7]   Bartoletti M, Carta S, Cimoli T, Saia R. Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Identification, analysis, and impact. Future Generation
                     Computer Systems, 2020, 102: 259–277. [doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.08.014]
                  [8]   Chen W, Zheng Z, Cui J, Ngai E, Zheng P, Zhou Y. Detecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Towards healthier blockchain technology. In:
                     Proc. of the 2018 World Wide Web Conf. Lyon: Int’l World Wide Web Conf. Steering Committee, 2018. 1409–1418. [doi: 10.1145/
                     3178876.3186046]
                  [9]   Chen WL, Zheng ZB, Ngai ECH, Zheng PL, Zhou YR. Exploiting blockchain data to detect smart Ponzi schemes on Ethereum. IEEE
                     Access, 2019, 7: 37575–37586. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905769]
                 [10]   Jung E, Le Tilly M, Gehani A, Ge YJ. Data mining-based Ethereum fraud detection. In: Proc. of the 2019 IEEE Int’l Conf. on Blockchain
                     (Blockchain). Atlanta: IEEE, 2019. 266–273. [doi: 10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00042]
                 [11]   He XZ, Yang T, Chen LP. CTRF: Ethereum-based Ponzi contract identification. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 2022:
                     1554752. [doi: 10.1155/2022/1554752]
                 [12]   Fan SH, Fu SJ, Xu HR, Cheng XC. Al-SPSD: Anti-leakage smart Ponzi schemes detection in blockchain. Information Processing &
                     Management, 2021, 58(4): 102587. [doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102587]
                 [13]   Wang L, Cheng H, Zheng ZB, Yang AJ, Zhu XH. Ponzi scheme detection via oversampling-based long short-term memory for smart
                     contracts. Knowledge-based Systems, 2021, 228: 107312. [doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107312]
                 [14]   Lou YC, Zhang YM, Chen SP. Ponzi contracts detection based on improved convolutional neural network. In: Proc. of the 2020 IEEE Int’l
                     Conf. on Services Computing (SCC). Beijing: IEEE, 2020. 353–360. [doi: 10.1109/SCC49832.2020.00053]
                 [15]   Bian LY, Zhang LL, Zhao K, Wang H, Gong SJ. Image-based scam detection method using an attention capsule network. IEEE Access,
                     2021, 9: 33654–33665. [doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059806]
                 [16]   Chen SB, Li F. Ponzi scheme detection in smart contracts using the integration of deep learning and formal verification. IET Blockchain,
                     2024, 4(2): 185–196. [doi: 10.1049/blc2.12056]
                 [17]   Sun WS, Xu GY, Yang ZJ, Chen ZY. Early detection of smart Ponzi scheme contracts based on behavior forest similarity. In: Proc. of the
                     20th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). Macao: IEEE, 2020. 297–309. [doi: 10.1109/QRS51102.2020.
                     00047]
                 [18]   Chen WM, Li XR, Sui YT, He NY, Wang HY, Wu L, Luo XP. SADPonzi: Detecting and characterizing Ponzi schemes in Ethereum
                     smart contracts. Proc. of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 2021, 5(2): 26. [doi: 10.1145/3460093]
                 [19]   Liang RC, Chen J, He K, Wu YM, Deng GL, Du RY, Wu C. PonziGuard: Detecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum with contract runtime
                     behavior graph (CRBG). In: Proc. of the 46th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Lisbon: ACM, 2024. 64. [doi: 10.1145/
                     3597503.3623318]
                 [20]   Goodfellow IJ, Shlens J, Szegedy C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv:1412.6572, 2014.
                 [21]   Szegedy  C,  Zaremba  W,  Sutskever  I,  Bruna  J,  Erhan  D,  Goodfellow  I,  Fergus  R.  Intriguing  properties  of  neural  networks.  arXiv:
                     1312.6199, 2013.
                 [22]   Athalye A, Carlini N. On the robustness of the CVPR 2018 white-box adversarial example defenses. arXiv:1804.03286, 2018.
                 [23]   Huang RT, Xu B, Schuurmans D, Szepesvári C. Learning with a strong adversary. arXiv:1511.03034, 2015.
                 [24]   Miyato T, Dai AM, Goodfellow I. Adversarial training methods for semi-supervised text classification. arXiv:1605.07725, 2016.
                 [25]   Madry A, Makelov A, Schmidt L, Tsipras D, Vladu A. arXiv:1706.06083, 2017.
                 [26]   Shafahi A, Najibi M, Ghiasi MA, Xu Z, Dickerson J, Studer C, Davis LS, Taylor G, Goldstein T. Adversarial training for free! In: Proc.
                     of the 33rd Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver: Curran Associates Inc., 2019. 302.
                 [27]   Zhang DH, Zhang TY, Lu YP, Zhu ZX, Dong B. You only propagate once: Accelerating adversarial training via maximal principle. In:
                     Proc. of the 33rd Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver: Curran Associates Inc., 2019. 21.
                 [28]   Jiang HM, He PC, Chen WZ, Liu XD, Gao JF, Zhao T. SMART: Robust and efficient fine-tuning for pre-trained natural language models
                     through principled regularized optimization. In: Proc. of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL,
                     2020. 2177–2190. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.197]
                 [29]   Li LY, Qiu XP. Token-aware virtual adversarial training in natural language understanding. In: Proc. of the 35th AAAI Conf. on Artificial
   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467