Page 229 - 《软件学报》2026年第3期

1192 软件学报 2026 年第 37 卷第 3 期

[7] Lu S, Guo DY, Ren S, Huang JJ, Svyatkovskiy A, Blanco A, Clement C, Drain D, Jiang DX, Tang DY, Li G, Zhou LD, Shou LJ, Zhou
L, Tufano M, Gong M, Zhou M, Duan N, Sundaresan N, Deng SK, Fu SY, Liu SJ. CodexGLUE: A machine learning benchmark dataset
for code understanding and generation. arXiv:2102.04664, 2021.
[8] Zhou YQ, Liu SQ, Siow J, Du XN, Liu Y. Devign: Effective vulnerability identification by learning comprehensive program semantics
via graph neural networks. In: Proc. of the 33rd Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates
Inc. , 2019. 10197–10207.
[9] White M, Tufano M, Vendome C, Poshyvanyk D. Deep learning code fragments for code clone detection. In: Proc. of the 31st
IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Singapore: IEEE, 2016. 87–98. [doi: ]
[10] Ahmad W, Chakraborty S, Ray B, Chang KW. A Transformer-based approach for source code summarization. In: Proc. of the 58th
Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, 2020. 4998–5007. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.449]
[11] Lu ZP, Hu HC, Huo SM, Li SY. Ensemble learning methods of adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: Recent progress. In:
Proc. of the 2021 Int’l Conf. on Advanced Computing and Endogenous Security. Nanjing: IEEE, 2022. 1–10. [doi: 10.1109/IEEECONF
52377.2022.10013347]
[12] Wang ZB, Guo HC, Zhang ZF, Liu WX, Qin Z, Ren K. Feature importance-aware transferable adversarial attacks. In: Proc. of the 2021
IEEE/CVF Int’l Conf. on Computer Vision. Montreal: IEEE, 2021. 7619–7628. [doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00754]
[13] Zhang WE, Sheng QZ, Alhazmi A, Li CL. Adversarial attacks on deep-learning models in natural language processing: A survey. ACM
Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2020, 11(3): 24. [doi: 10.1145/3374217]
[14] Morris J, Lifland E, Yoo JY, Grigsby J, Jin D, Qi YJ. TextAttack: A framework for adversarial attacks, data augmentation, and
adversarial training in NLP. In: Proc. of the 2020 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations.
ACL, 2020. 119–126. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.16]
[15] Tian Z, Chen JJ, Jin Z. Code difference guided adversarial example generation for deep code models. In: Proc. of the 38th IEEE/ACM
Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Luxembourg: IEEE, 2023. 850–862. [doi: 10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00149]
[16] Du XH, Wen M, Wei ZC, Wang SW, Jin H. An extensive study on adversarial attack against pre-trained models of code. In: Proc. of the
31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conf. and Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering. San Francisco: ACM,
2023. 489–501. [doi: 10.1145/3611643.3616356]
[17] Cao XJ, Chen JJ, Yan M, You HM, Wu Z, Wang Z. Test case selection for neural network via data mutation. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/
Journal of Software, 2024, 35(11): 4973–4992 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/7005.htm [doi: 10.
13328/j.cnki.jos.007005]
[18] Zhang HZ, Li Z, Li G, Ma L, Liu Y, Jin Z. Generating adversarial examples for holding robustness of source code processing models.
In: Proc. of the 2020 AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. New York: AAAI Press, 2020. 1169–1176. [doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5469]
[19] Yang Z, Shi JK, He JD, Lo D. Natural attack for pre-trained models of code. In: Proc. of the 44th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering.
Pittsburgh: ACM, 2022. 1482–1493. [doi: 10.1145/3510003.3510146]
[20] Zhang HZ, Fu ZY, Li G, Ma L, Zhao ZH, Yang HA, Sun YZ, Liu Y, Jin Z. Towards robustness of deep program processing models—
Detection, estimation, and enhancement. ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2022, 31(3): 50. [doi: 10.1145/
3511887]
[21] Zeng ZR, Tan HZ, Zhang HT, Li J, Zhang YQ, Zhang LM. An extensive study on pre-trained models for program understanding and
generation. In: Proc. of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT Int’l Symp. on Software Testing and Analysis. ACM, 2022. 39–51. [doi: 10.1145/
3533767.3534390]
[22] Karmakar A, Robbes R. What do pre-trained code models know about code? In: Proc. of the 36th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated
Software Engineering. Melbourne: IEEE, 2021. 1332–1336. [doi: 10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678927]
[23] Shi ES, Wang YL, Zhang HY, Du L, Han S, Zhang DM, Sun HB. Towards efficient fine-tuning of pre-trained code models: An
experimental study and beyond. In: Proc. of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT Int’l Symp. on Software Testing and Analysis. Seattle: ACM,
2023. 39–51. [doi: 10.1145/3597926.3598036]
[24] Zhu QH, Liang QY, Sun ZY, Xiong YF, Zhang L, Cheng SY. GrammarT5: Grammar-integrated pretrained encoder-decoder neural
model for code. In: Proc. of the 46th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Lisbon: ACM, 2024. 1–13. [doi: 10.1145/
3597503.3639125]
[25] Nijkamp E, Pang B, Hayashi H, Tu LF, Wang H, Zhou YB, Savarese S, Xiong CM. CodeGen: An open large language model for code
with multi-turn program synthesis. arXiv:2203.13474, 2022.
[26] Lewis M, Liu YH, Goyal N, Ghazvininejad M, Mohamed A, Levy O, Stoyanov V, Zettlemoyer L. BART: Denoising sequence-to-
sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In: Proc. of the 58th Annual Meeting of the