Page 344 - 《软件学报》2025年第8期

赵衔麟 等: 面向代码注释生成任务的注释质量评价研究 3767

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, 2021. 2842–2851. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.251]
[73] Wei BL, Li YM, Li G, Xia X, Jin Z. Retrieve and refine: Exemplar-based neural comment generation. In: Proc. of the 35th IEEE/ACM
Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Melbourne: IEEE, 2020. 349–360.
[74] Li JA, Li YM, Li G, Hu X, Xia X, Jin Z. EditSum: A retrieve-and-edit framework for source code summarization. In: Proc. of the 36th
IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Melbourne: IEEE, 2021. 155–166. [doi: 10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678724]
[75] Shi ES, Wang YL, Du L, Zhang HY, Han S, Zhang DM, Sun HB. CAST: Enhancing code summarization with hierarchical splitting and
reconstruction of abstract syntax trees. In: Proc. of the 2021 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Punta Cana:
ACL, 2021. 4053–4062. [doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.332]
[76] Wang WH, Zhang YQ, Sui YL, Wan Y, Zhao Z, Wu J, Yu PS, Xu GD. Reinforcement-learning-guided source code summarization using
hierarchical attention. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 2022, 48(1): 102–119. [doi: 10.1109/TSE.2020.2979701]
[77] Sridhara G, Hill E, Muppaneni D, Pollock L, Vijay-Shanker K. Towards automatically generating summary comments for Java methods.
In: Proc. of the 25th IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering. Antwerp: ACM, 2010. 43–52. [doi: 10.1145/1858996.
1859006]
[78] Tan L, Yuan D, Krishna G, Zhou YY. /*icomment: Bugs or bad comments?*/. In: Proc. of the 21st ACM SIGOPS Symp. on Operating
Systems Principles. Stevenson: ACM, 2007. 145–158. [doi: 10.1145/1294261.129427]
[79] Tan SH, Marinov D, Tan L, Leavens GT. @tComment: Testing Javadoc comments to detect comment-code inconsistencies. In: Proc. of
the 5th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. Montreal: IEEE, 2012. 260–269. [doi: 10.1109/ICST.2012.
106]
[80] Blasi A, Gorla A. Replicomment: Identifying clones in code comments. In: Proc. of the 26th Conf. on Program Comprehension.
Gothenburg: ACM, 2018. 320–323. [doi: 10.1145/3196321.3196360]
[81] Corazza A, Maggio V, Scanniello G. On the coherence between comments and implementations in source code. In: Proc. of the 41st
Euromicro Conf. on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. Madeira: IEEE, 2015. 76–83. [doi: 10.1109/SEAA.2015.20]
[82] Corazza A, Maggio V, Scanniello G. Coherence of comments and method implementations: A dataset and an empirical investigation.
Software Quality Journal, 2018, 26(2): 751–777. [doi: 10.1007/s11219-016-9347-1]
[83] McBurney PW, McMillan C. An empirical study of the textual similarity between source code and source code summaries. Empirical
Software Engineering, 2016, 21(1): 17–42. [doi: 10.1007/s10664-014-9344-6]
[84] Iammarino M, Aversano L, Bernardi ML, Cimitile M. A topic modeling approach to evaluate the comments consistency to source code.
In: Proc. of the 2020 Int’l Joint Conf. on Neural Networks. Glasgow: IEEE, 2020. 1–8. [doi: 10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9207651]
[85] Rabbi F, Haque N, Kadir E, Siddik S, Kabir A. An ensemble approach to detect code comment inconsistencies using topic modeling. In:
Proc. of the 32nd Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. KSI Research Inc., 2020. 392–395.
[86] Khamis N, Witte R, Rilling J. Automatic quality assessment of source code comments: The JavadocMiner. In: Proc. of the 15th Int’l
Conf. on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Cardiff: Springer, 2010. 68–79. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_7]
[87] Sun XB, Geng Q, Lo D, Duan YC, Liu XY, Li B. Code comment quality analysis and improvement recommendation: An automated
approach. Int’l Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2016, 26(6): 981–1000. [doi: 10.1142/S0218194
016500339]
[88] Scalabrino S, Linares-Vásquez M, Poshyvanyk D, Oliveto R. Improving code readability models with textual features. In: Proc. of the
24th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Program Comprehension. Austin: IEEE, 2016. 1–10. [doi: 10.1109/ICPC.2016.7503707]
[89] Scalabrino S, Linares-Vásquez M, Oliveto R, Poshyvanyk D. A comprehensive model for code readability. Journal of Software:
Evolution and Process, 2018, 30(6): e1958. [doi: 10.1002/smr.1958]
[90] Aman H, Amasaki S, Yokogawa T, Kawahara M. A Doc2Vec-based assessment of comments and its application to change-prone method
analysis. In: Proc. of the 25th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conf. Nara: IEEE, 2018. 643–647. [doi: 10.1109/APSEC.2018.00082]
[91] Sridhara G, Pollock L, Vijay-Shanker K. Generating parameter comments and integrating with method summaries. In: Proc. of the 19th
IEEE Int’l Conf. on Program Comprehension. Kingston: IEEE, 2011. 71–80. [doi: 10.1109/ICPC.2011.28]
[92] Pawelka T, Juergens E. Is this code written in English? A study of the natural language of comments and identifiers in practice. In: Proc.
of the 2015 IEEE Int’l Conf. on Software Maintenance and Evolution. Bremen: IEEE, 2015. 401–410. [doi: 10.1109/ICSM.2015.
7332491]
[93] Hata H, Treude C, Kula RG, Ishio T. 9.6 million links in source code comments: Purpose, evolution, and decay. In: Proc. of the 41st
IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. Montreal: IEEE, 2019. 1211–1221. [doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00123]
[94] Pan XL, Liu CX, Zou YZ, Xie T, Xie B. MESIA: Understanding and leveraging supplementary nature of method-level comments for
automatic comment generation. In: Proc. of the 32nd IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. on Program Comprehension. Lisbon: IEEE, 2024. 74–86.