Page 104 - 《爆炸与冲击》2026年第5期
P. 104

第 46 卷             冯    彬,等: 基于图神经网络的可燃气体泄漏扩散预测方法                               第 5 期

                    approaches of gas explosion in the chemical process industry: a review [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,
                    2023, 170: 112–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.090.
               [12]   PRASAD K, PITTS W M, YANG J C. A numerical study of the release and dispersion of a buoyant gas in partially confined
                    spaces [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(8): 5200–5210. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.118.
               [13]   MEI Y, SHUAI J. Research on natural gas leakage and diffusion characteristics in enclosed building layout [J]. Process Safety
                    and Environmental Protection, 2022, 161: 247–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.040.
               [14]   SU Y, LI J F, YU B, et al. Numerical investigation on the leakage and diffusion characteristics of hydrogen-blended natural
                    gas in a domestic kitchen [J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 189: 899–916. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.038.
               [15]   KANG Y, MA S Y, SONG B X, et al. Simulation of hydrogen leakage diffusion behavior in confined space [J]. International
                    Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 53: 75–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.026.
               [16]   WANG B, CHEN B Z, ZHAO J S. The real-time estimation of hazardous gas dispersion by the integration of gas detectors,
                    neural network and gas dispersion models [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 300: 433–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.
                    2015.07.028.
               [17]   QIU S H, CHEN B, WANG R X, et al. Atmospheric dispersion prediction and source estimation of hazardous gas using
                    artificial neural network, particle swarm optimization and expectation maximization [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 178:
                    158–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.056.
               [18]   TANG X, WU D L, WANG S M, et al. Research on real-time prediction of hydrogen sulfide leakage diffusion concentration
                    of new energy based on machine learning [J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9): 7237. DOI: 10.3390/su15097237.
               [19]   ZHANG X Q, SHI J H, LI J J, et al. Hydrogen jet and diffusion modeling by physics-informed graph neural network [J].
                    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 207: 114898. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114898.
               [20]   HANSEN O R, GAVELLI F, DAVIS S G, et al. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies [J].
                    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(3): 511–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.006.
               [21]   TAM V H Y, TAN F, SAVVIDES C. A critical review of the equivalent stoichiometric cloud model Q9 in gas explosion
                    modelling [J]. Eng, 2021, 2(2): 156–180. DOI: 10.3390/eng2020011.
               [22]   齐心歌, 王海清, 田英帅, 等. 基于等价气云爆炸风险评估的气体防护区域定量划分 [J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(3): 1587–
                    1594. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0153.
                    QI X G, WANG H Q, TIAN Y S, et al. Quantitative division of gas protection area based on risk assessment of equivalent gas
                    cloud explosion [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(3): 1587–1594. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.
                    2018-0153.
               [23]   师吉浩. 海洋平台燃爆风险分析及抗爆减灾设计研究 [D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学                   (华东), 2018. DOI: 10.27644/d.cnki.
                    gsydu.2018.001848.
                    SHI J H. Research on explosion risk analysis and mitigation design of offshore platforms [D]. Qingdao: China University of
                    Petroleum (East China), 2018. DOI: 10.27644/d.cnki.gsydu.2018.001848.
               [24]   师燕超, 么志远, 袁明德, 等. 综合管廊天然气泄漏爆炸的定量风险评估 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(11): 129–136. DOI:
                    10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2021.0677.
                    SHI Y C, YAO Z Y, YUAN M D, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of natural gas leakage and explosion in utility tunnel [J].
                    Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(11): 129–136. DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2021.0677.
               [25]   BATTAGLIA P W, HAMRICK J B, BAPST V, et al. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks [EB/OL].
                    arXiv: 1806.01261. (2018-10-17)[2024-01-17]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01261. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1806.01261.
               [26]   SCARSELLI F, GORI M, TSOI A C, et al. The graph neural network model [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,
                    2009, 20(1): 61–80. DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605.
               [27]   GILMER J, SCHOENHOLZ S S, RILEY P F, et al. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry [C]//Proceedings of the
                    34th International Conference on Machine Learning. Sydney: PMLR, 2017: 1263–1272.
               [28]   PFAFF T, FORTUNATO M, SANCHEZ-GONZALEZ A, et al. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks [C]//9th
                    International Conference on Learning Representations. ICLR, 2021.
               [29]   LI  Q  L,  WANG  Y,  CHEN  W  S,  et  al.  Machine  learning  prediction  of  BLEVE  loading  with  graph  neural  networks  [J].
                    Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024, 241: 109639. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109639.
               [30]   SHI J H, LI J J, TAM W C, et al. Physics_GNN: towards physics-informed graph neural network for the real-time simulation


                                                         051431-19
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109